Top
Ten Myths Business Owners Need to Know About Divorce
There are a lot of misconceptions about divorce. Divorce
conjures up images of movies such as Kramer v. Kramer, where the parties
engage in a protracted custody battle or War of the Roses, where the
parties literally kill each other.
Surprisingly, it is the divorce lawyer, Gavin D’Amato
(Danny DeVito) in War of the Roses who was most prophetic when he tells
Oliver Rose, “There is no winning in this, its only degrees of
losing!”
However, D’Amato was incorrect. Had the Roses
pursued an amicable divorce, and employed methods such as collaborative
divorce or facilitative mediation, they could have crafted a win-win
solution that kept their entire house intact. Of course, it would have
made for a very boring movie.
Myth
#1 - The divorce has to be expensive. Your divorce only has
to cost as much as you and your spouse want it to cost. By avoiding
litigation, you can avoid much of the cost of a typical divorce. Most
of the expense is incurred during discovery, the information gathering
stage of the case. Simply by voluntarily exchanging financial documents
the parties can save unnecessary expense. Further, the parties may agree
on using one business valuator, instead of hiring competing experts.
Myth
#2 - The business records will become part of the public record.
By staying out of the courtroom, your business records will remain private.
In a collaborative divorce, the parties and their attorneys agree to
exchange any necessary documents and to conduct all negotiations in
four way meetings with all of the parties present. If the parties need
to valuate the business, the parties will agree on a valuator to bring
into the process to provide assistance to both parties. Since the entire
process remains private, the business records remain private.
Myth
#3 - The divorce will be disruptive to the business. Just like
other areas of your life, it is your choice how disruptive the divorce
will be to your business. If you choose to litigate, you will frequently
have to take time away from the business to go to court, go to the Friend
of the Court, meet with your lawyer or complete tasks related to the
divorce. However, if you decide to have an amicable divorce, you can
avoid court scheduled hearings and you can have input into when meetings
are to be scheduled and the pace of the negotiations. Most importantly,
by taking much of the stress out of the process, it will be easier to
concentrate on your business.
Myth
#4 - The divorce has to be litigated through the courts. The
law requires that a Complaint for Divorce be filed to start the process
and that a Judgment of Divorce be entered at the conclusion for the
divorce for the divorce to be effective. But how you get from Point
A to Point B is up to you and your lawyer. In Oakland County in 2005,
4068 divorce judgments were entered. Of those, only 38 went to trial.
Therefore, since the odds of going to trial are remote, I recommend
other avenues toward a settlement. In Collaborative Practice, for example,
the parties actually sign a contract agreeing to stay out of court.
In fact, the contract states that if either party wants to stop the
negotiations and go to court, the lawyers will withdraw. This provide
an incentive to the parties to stay at the table and a disincentive
to the attorneys to muck up the process so they can get a larger fee.
Myth
#5 - The parties are best served by an aggressive, “pit
bull” attorney. Ask 10 divorce lawyers to predict the outcome
of a typical divorce and 9 will tell you that, in Michigan, the courts
generally divide the assets 50/50. If the courts are predisposed to
divide assets equally, why is it necessary to hire an aggressive attorney?
Many attorneys will tell you that you need to be aggressive so you can
negotiate from a position of strength. However, in my experience, the
only certainty is that aggressive actions by one party results in equally
aggressive responses, causing the hostility to escalate.
Myth
#6 - That both parties will have to spend money on hiring separate
appraisers, CPAs and other experts. In litigation, each party usually
hires their own expert to valuate the family business. Each party could
pay $5,000 - $20,000 to their respective expert. And since the Judge
will presume that each expert will skew the numbers in favor of their
client, frequently the Judge will split the difference between the appraisers.
In an amicable divorce, the parties can agree to split the cost of an
appraiser and agree to utilize the results. Splitting the cost of experts
can greatly reduce the cost of your divorce.
Myth
#7 - The divorce process must be long and drawn out. Michigan
law provides that you must wait 60 days from the date of filing to enter
the Judgment if you do not have minor children and 180 days if you do
have minor children (and under certain circumstances, the Judge may
waive the 180 day waiting period). If the parties cooperate, there is
no reason why the divorce cannot be completed as soon as the waiting
period expires. In many divorce, the longest delays are creating during
discovery, where parties send Interrogatories to the other party and
subpoena countless documents. Frequently the documents can be exchanged
by the parties much faster without a formal discovery request. By working
collaboratively, the divorce can be completed much quicker than it can
in litigation.
Myth
#8 - The divorce process has to be contentious. In our experience,
once most people decide they want a divorce, they would like the process
to be completed as quickly and efficiently as possible. But the common
misconception is They must hire the most aggressive lawyer and must
dig in for a long, contentious battle. I believe The parties should
dictate the tone and pace of the divorce. Therefore, we encourage our
clients to try collaborative practice or mediation as methods to reduce
the animosity and to keep the parties focused on reaching a fair solution.
Myth
#9 - The parties must go to mediation only at the end of the
case. In a typical divorce, the court will order the parties to attend
mediation just prior to trial. Therefore, the parties engage in discovery,
will have to appear in court at least twice, at the Friend of the Court
at least once, not including any motions filed by either party, before
engaging in serious settlement discussion. I prefer to attend mediation
at the beginning of the case. By doing so, we can establish lines of
communication and set a positive tone for the remainder of the divorce.
Frequently, we can resolve some of the minor issues in the case and
make decisions about what information is needed to complete the case
in order to save time and money. Further, by retaining a mediator, a
process is already in place to help resolve further disputes without
going in front of the Judge.
Myth
#10 - That both parties will be financially poorer after the
divorce. (One party doesn’t have to suffer) I admit that this
one is a stretch. However, in an amicable divorce, the parties spend
more time negotiating instead of litigating. Since every divorce is
unique, this allows for more creativity in crafting a settlement than
you will get in court. You could arrange for longer term payouts, exchanging
dissimilar assets (equity in the home for retirement accounts) or any
other arrangement that works for you. While you cannot create a bigger
pie to divide, you can create a financial win-win solution.